Rejects Bail Plea Of Revenue Officer Arrested By CBI Red-Handed With Rs 18000 Bribe
Jammu, July 5: The High Court of J&K and Ladakh has said that offences under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act and those against the human body cannot be dealt with the same yardsticks.
The court made the observation as it rejected bail to a Revenue Official, arrested by CBI while accepting Rs.18,000 bribe, observing that the probability of him influencing the complainant and the witnesses by offering them monetary benefit was extremely high and not certainly improbable.
“Though the investigation has been completed and the charge-sheet is filed, if the accused is released prematurely, there is a real danger of him attempting to win over the complainant, shadow witnesses and others, who are witnesses to the seizure memorandums, to turn hostile before the trial Court,” the court said, finding force in the apprehension by the CBI counsel that upon search of the residential premises of the applicant, a sum of Rs.3,71,000 was also recovered in cash and that investigation is also underway to trace the proceeds of the crime in view of the huge recovery of cash.
The court also said it differs in the opinion that an offence under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act can also be dealt with the same yardsticks that may be applied for offences against human body or other categories of offences.
“It must be borne in mind that offence against human body may be a crime of passion which may at times result in one man taking the life of another in a fit of anger arising at the moment without premeditation and without any preparation. However, offences of cheating, corruption and other white color offences are impossible to be committed without serious premeditation,” the court said, “For the offence for which the applicant has been accused of, a great deal of planning, arrangements and other associations with co-accused persons are required before the transfer of money can take place effectively from the victim to the accused.”
Such persons have their own contacts, touts and agents, who intercede with the victim on behalf of the corrupt official and coax him to part with money for a solution based upon the discretionary power of that public servant, the court added.