Open merit aspirants in a dilemma as job opportunities shrink in J&K
Srinagar, Nov 25: Recent government job notifications in Jammu and Kashmir have ignited a fierce debate on reservation policies, with open merit candidates challenging the system’s fairness.
The School Education Department’s announcement of 575 lecturer posts—where only 238 were allocated to open merit compared to 337 reserved seats—and the police department’s notification of 669 sub-inspector posts, with just 267 open merit positions, have intensified student discontent.
“We put in equal, if not more, effort than others, yet our chances are disproportionately low because of the reservation system,” said Tanvir Ahmad, a Srinagar-based candidate, reflecting widespread frustration among open merit aspirants.
The stark disparity in job allocation has raised critical questions about meritocracy, with students arguing that the current reservation framework significantly undermines their professional opportunities. The notifications highlight a systemic challenge: balancing inclusive representation with fair competition.
Adding to the frustration, another Kashmiri aspirant also expressed his shock on Twitter while sharing his rank, which was 739. Despite this, he couldn’t secure a spot in radio diagnosis at SKIMS because he did not belong to a reserved category. He pointed out that candidates with a rank of 91,088 from other regions were admitted to the same course, further igniting debate on the fairness of the reservation system.
Supporters of reservation policies, however, defend them as a necessary mechanism to address historical injustices and provide opportunities for underrepresented communities. “Reservation plays a role in making opportunities equal for us too. Without it, our communities would face immense difficulties in breaking generational barriers,” said Ruqsana (name changed), a student from a reserved category who recently qualified for the UGC NET examination.
The issue has drawn attention from student organizations as well, who emphasize the need for equity and transparency in the reservation system. Nasir Khuehami, National Spokesperson for the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association, highlighted the growing anxiety among students. “We request the government to conduct a caste census in the Union Territory. This would bring transparency to the population data and dispel misconceptions. Students are not against reservation; they simply want a fair and balanced approach. The current system has even led to psychosomatic disorders among students due to the stress of reduced opportunities,” he said.
In the broader debate, some have suggested an income-based reservation model, arguing that such a system would ensure that economically disadvantaged individuals, regardless of their caste or background, benefit. “An income-based policy could provide a more equitable solution and help reduce dissatisfaction,” said a parent attending a public meeting on the issue.
In response to the outcry, the Jammu and Kashmir government announced on Friday the formation of a sub-committee to review the reservation policy. This move is seen as a step toward addressing the concerns of all stakeholders.
The debate over reservation highlights the challenges of balancing social justice and meritocracy. As the government deliberates, students and the public await measures that can ensure inclusivity without compromising fairness in employment opportunities. For many, the outcome of this policy review could define the future trajectory of equal opportunity in the region.
